arbiter — can an LLM agent beat a plain model on SEC filings?
A benchmark that gives an agent and a baseline identical point-in-time data. Result so far: no measurable skill from either.
Pythonscikit-learnGitHub Actions
Question
Does an LLM agent beat a conventional model at forecasting short-horizon equity moves from SEC filings, when both see byte-identical, point-in-time data?
How it works
- Each filing is frozen into an immutable, content-hashed evidence packet stamped with its acceptance time.
- Domains: insider trades (Form 4) and 8-K red flags.
- Four arms:
baseline(logistic regression),dl,agent, andarbiter(cross-family review). - Scored by information coefficient and calibration on a chronological split with an embargo, so nothing from the future leaks in.
Result
On the walk-forward evaluation the information coefficient was +0.029 (t = 1.52): not distinguishable from zero. I report it as a null result. The value of the project is the harness that makes a claim like this checkable.
Status
Active. Python 3.12, MIT licence, CI on GitHub Actions.